Court Docket · 62 records · Last updated Aug 3, 2026
This docket lists civil lawsuits and class actions that name Greystar or its affiliates, with court, case number where available, and current status. Filed complaints contain allegations that have not been proven; where a case settled, we note whether Greystar admitted wrongdoing. Each entry links to the court record or the reporting it is based on.
Citing Law360, PYMNTS reports that Kentucky settled its antitrust claims against Greystar Management Services in AG Russell Coleman's RealPage suit, filed July 2025 in the Eastern District of Kentucky (kentucky-ag-v-realpage-greystar-2025). Terms were not disclosed. It adds that a federal judge had earlier let key claims proceed after Greystar sought dismissal, and that the complaint alleged hundreds of thousands of Kentucky renters were affected.
Law360 reports that Kentucky settled its federal antitrust claims against Greystar Management Services, which the state alleged used RealPage revenue-management software to fix rents. This is the source of the July 2026 Greystar settlement noted on kentucky-ag-v-realpage-greystar-2025.
According to Law360, a North Carolina federal judge gave final sign-off on March 2, 2026 to the Justice Department's antitrust settlement with Greystar Management Services in the federal RealPage rent price-fixing case. This finalizes the consent decree proposed in August 2025 (doj-greystar-realpage-consent-decree-2025).
Trade-press coverage of the RealPage MDL class settlements in the Middle District of Tennessee (realpage-mdl-greystar-50m-class-settlement-2025). It adds the full picture: 26 class settlements worth $141.8 million, with Greystar's $50 million the largest and Simpson, Avenue5, Bell, Bozzuto, Pinnacle and Winn also settling. Settlers agreed to stop sharing nonpublic data with RealPage's rent-setting algorithm, with no admission of wrongdoing.
Reuters report on Greystar's $50 million settlement of the renter class action in the RealPage MDL (realpage-mdl-greystar-50m-class-settlement-2025). Renters alleged Greystar and other landlords shared nonpublic data with RealPage to push rents above competitive levels. Greystar's deal was the largest in a group of preliminary class settlements totaling about $141 million.
In the consolidated private antitrust MDL alleging landlords used RealPage software to align rents, Greystar agreed to pay $50 million as part of more than $141 million in proposed settlements filed with 25+ landlords, and to stop sharing nonpublic data with RealPage. Greystar announced an agreement in principle on Aug. 8, 2025, stating it admitted no wrongdoing.
A former tenant sued Greystar Management Services and a concrete contractor, alleging he was exposed to silica dust from concrete work, reported it to Greystar and OSHA (which fined the contractor more than $58,000), and was then evicted for allegedly 'photographing the vendors without consent.' Greystar denies most allegations and says it had no control over the contractor's work.
A self-represented tenant sued Greystar Real Estate Partners, Kapilina Beach Homes and utility-billing firm Conservice, pleading civil RICO and fraud claims, according to the federal docket.
Reuters report that Greystar faced additional proposed class actions over alleged hidden 'junk fees' after the January 2025 FTC/Colorado suit (ftc-colorado-v-greystar-complaint-2025). Its timing matches the California suit filed in the Southern District of California in late April 2025 (wu-v-greystar-california-junk-fees-2025).
The proposed class action alleges Greystar 'drip priced' California rentals by charging mandatory fees for pest control, trash and utility administration not included in advertised rent, in violation of the UCL, False Advertising Law, CLRA and California's Honest Pricing Law.
Filed on behalf of tenants who moved out early and were charged, or had deposits applied to, buy-out fees, reletting charges and/or future rent. Greystar removed the case to federal court, which remanded it to King County Superior Court.
The class complaint alleges Greystar forced thousands of Colorado tenants to pay inflated, late-disclosed 'junk fees' on top of advertised rent that provided no benefit beyond ordinary landlord costs, and seeks to stop the practice and recover damages.
Tenants of The Eddy in East Boston sued Greystar affiliate GREP Atlantic and the building owner, alleging 'eviction/legal recovery' fees were charged without a court judgment, in violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act. The court dismissed one claim but allowed two to proceed, and allowed some Greystar counterclaims.
A Dallas County jury awarded about $860 million to the parents of a resident killed when a tower crane at a Greystar development collapsed onto the neighboring Elan City Lights apartments during a June 2019 storm. Plaintiffs argued Greystar let the crane's inspection lapse and was responsible for the crane not being left in weathervane mode; the jury found crane owner Bigge not liable.
A self-represented tenant filed a civil rights suit against Greystar Real Estate Partners, Bob Faith (individually and in his official capacity), a property-owning LLC, Spokane County, a law firm and others. The district case closed in May 2023; the Ninth Circuit appeal, which the clerk flagged as possibly frivolous, closed in September 2023.
Tenants alleged Greystar unlawfully charged North Carolina residents filing fees, sheriff service fees and attorneys' fees in eviction actions and threatened such fees in collection letters (2014-2018), in violation of state rental and debt-collection law. Greystar agreed to a $4,665,000 class settlement without admitting wrongdoing (final fairness hearing July 22, 2022).
The class alleged Greystar charged rental applicants in Washington tenant-screening fees without the advance disclosures state law requires (applications June 2016 - August 2020). Greystar denied wrongdoing and agreed to a $2.5 million settlement, which the court finalized Feb. 1, 2022.
Residents displaced by the Aug. 19, 2020 fire at Avana on Main sued GS Main Street, LLC, Greystar Management Services, L.P. and a service technician, seeking damages arising from the fire.
The complaint alleges Greystar charged $100 late fees untethered to actual damages, applied rent payments to prior penalties first so late fees 'stacked' month to month, charged unauthorized $3.95 utility-administration fees, and mishandled security-deposit deductions and return timelines under California law.
Housing Rights Initiative and an older D.C. resident sued 10 property managers, including Greystar, alleging they targeted Facebook apartment ads to exclude users over 50; they had earlier filed age-bias charges with D.C. and Montgomery County human rights offices (Sept. 2019). The district case closed in July 2021 and the Fourth Circuit affirmed dismissal on standing grounds in March 2025.
A proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act alleges Greystar Management Services failed to include non-discretionary bonuses in the regular rate used to compute overtime pay.
A former tenant sued Greystar Management Services, a landscaping contractor and a sheriff's lieutenant, alleging Fair Housing Act retaliation, conversion and constitutional claims arising from the alleged deprivation of her personal property during a December 2011 eviction. The case went to the Fourth Circuit (No. 14-2145) and back; the district court issued further rulings in 2016 and the docket closed in February 2017 without a judgment for the plaintiff.